In Georgia, where is venue generally considered appropriate in tort litigation?

In Georgia, venue for tort litigation is generally considered appropriate in two primary locations: where the defendant resides and where the harm occurred. When determining the proper venue, the law recognizes that the defendant's residence is a logical choice because it allows for fair notice and convenience for the person being sued. Additionally, the location where the harm occurred is significant because it relates directly to the events that gave rise to the lawsuit, allowing the court to effectively address the issues involved.

This approach reflects a balance between the interests of the plaintiff in pursuing their claim and the fairness to the defendant, who should not be compelled to defend a lawsuit in an inconvenient or unrelated jurisdiction. As such, these two bases provide a clear guideline for settling disputes over the appropriate venue in tort cases, which ultimately serves to promote judicial efficiency and access to justice.