What is typically required for an expert to provide testimony in a case involving allegations of malpractice?

For an expert to provide testimony in a malpractice case, it is essential that they have current knowledge in their field. This requirement ensures that the expert's opinions are based on the most recent and relevant information, practices, and standards within their area of expertise. Adequate and contemporary knowledge allows the expert to offer valuable insights and evaluate the defendant's conduct accurately in light of prevailing standards in the profession, ultimately aiding the court in understanding complex issues.

This requirement stands in contrast to other considerations such as having a social media presence, which is not relevant to the credentials or expertise of an individual testifying in court. Similarly, while past malpractice claims or existing collaborations with the defendant may affect an expert's credibility or impartiality, they do not directly pertain to the expert's qualifications to testify based on current knowledge in their field. Therefore, the most critical factor remains the expert's up-to-date understanding and knowledge, ensuring that their testimony is credible and reliable.