What must a lawyer consider when deciding to withdraw from representation?

When a lawyer contemplates withdrawal from representation, a primary consideration must be the potential material harm to the client’s interests. This aspect encompasses ethical obligations under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly Rule 1.16, which emphasizes that a lawyer should not withdraw if doing so would adversely affect the client’s interests.

The lawyer needs to assess whether the withdrawal could impede the client’s ability to receive effective representation, especially in ongoing legal matters, or if it exacerbates a difficult situation for the client. If the client's interests would suffer materially as a result of the lawyer's withdrawal, it can be deemed inappropriate to proceed with the exit from representation without ensuring that the client is protected or that the withdrawal occurs in a manner that mitigates potential harm.

Addressing the other considerations: while a lawyer might take into account client dissatisfaction or outstanding fees, these are secondary to ensuring that the client's legal and personal interests are safeguarded. Moreover, the ease of finding a replacement attorney, while relevant to the practicality of withdrawal, does not outweigh the significance of the potential impact on the client’s case or their rights.