What must evidence demonstrate in order to be considered relevant in Georgia courts?

In Georgia courts, evidence is deemed relevant if it has the ability to make a fact of consequence more or less probable than it would be without that evidence. This definition aligns with the general standard for relevance found in the rules of evidence. Evidence that meets this criterion can impact the determination of the case by helping to establish or deny key facts at issue.

The requirement for relevance focuses on the connection between the evidence and the facts being determined in a legal proceeding. It does not necessitate that the evidence is easily understandable, nor does it require that it exclusively supports one side's claims. Furthermore, corroboration by eyewitness testimony is not a prerequisite for evidence to be considered relevant. Instead, any piece of evidence that can influence the outcome by affecting the likelihood of a particular fact being true is relevant, regardless of its source or clarity.