What must the expert do to ensure their testimony is admissible in Georgia?

To ensure expert testimony is admissible in Georgia, it is essential for the expert to apply reliable principles to the facts of the case. This requirement aligns with Georgia's adherence to the Daubert standard, which focuses on the reliability and relevance of the testimony being presented. The expert must not only have specialized knowledge but also utilize established methods and principles that are recognized in their field to analyze the specifics of the case at hand. This foundation allows the court to assess the validity of the testimony, ensuring that it contributes meaningfully to the resolution of the case.

In contrast to the correct choice, relying solely on personal opinion would not provide enough credibility to the testimony, as it lacks the necessary foundation in established practices. The outcomes of similar past cases may inform an expert’s understanding or approach but do not directly establish the reliability of their testimony in the current case at bar. Meanwhile, submitting written documentation for review is not a determinative factor for admissibility in itself; while such documentation can enhance the credibility of the testimony, the core requirement remains focused on applying valid principles to the facts specific to the case.