Which condition is NOT a requirement for seeking an injunction in Georgia?

In seeking an injunction in Georgia, the existence of sufficient funds is not a requirement. The primary criteria for granting an injunction typically focus on the possibility of irreparable harm, the likelihood of success on the merits of the case, and the absence of an adequate remedy at law.

Irreparable harm refers to a situation where the injury cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages. If such harm is imminent or ongoing, a court is more likely to intervene through an injunction. The likelihood of success on the merits assesses whether the party seeking the injunction has a strong case that could prevail if it were to go to trial. Lastly, if there is an adequate remedy at law—meaning that monetary damages would suffice to remedy the situation—the court may not grant an injunction.

Thus, the requirement concerning funds does not align with the critical legal factors that courts evaluate when considering the issuance of an injunction in Georgia. This distinction is essential for understanding the legal framework governing equitable relief.