Which scenario allows a lawyer to permissively withdraw from representation?

A lawyer is allowed to permissively withdraw from representation under certain circumstances that justify such a decision. In the scenario of client misconduct or failure to pay, these situations provide a valid basis for a lawyer to withdraw from representing a client.

Client misconduct may include actions such as dishonesty, fraud, or failure to cooperate with the attorney's efforts, which can significantly impair the attorney's ability to provide effective representation. Similarly, a client’s failure to pay legal fees can create a significant strain on the attorney-client relationship, undermining the feasibility of continuing the representation. Therefore, both client misconduct and non-payment of fees are recognized justifications for permissive withdrawal, as the attorney has a duty to maintain professional integrity and ensure that their resources are allocated effectively.

Other scenarios, such as a client's change of mind, withdrawal due to a lawyer's personal reasons, or unfavorable legal precedents, do not similarly justify withdrawal. For example, if a client simply decides they no longer want to pursue a case, the attorney might not have a strong basis to withdraw unless it creates a conflict or ethical concern. Personal reasons for a lawyer's withdrawal must also typically involve situations that affect the lawyer's ability to represent the client adequately, rather than mere preference or inconvenience. Unf